buildings_with_cast_in-situ_load-bearing_reinforced_concrete_walls

KYRGYZSTAN

Buildings with cast in-situ load-bearing reinforced concrete walls

1. General Information

Buildings with cast in-situ load-bearing reinforced concrete walls Report #: 40

Report Date:

Country: KYRGYZSTAN

Housing Type:

Housing Sub-Type:

Author(s): Svetlana Uranova, Ulugbek T. Begaliev , Manukovskiy V.

Last Updated:

Regions Where Found: Buildings of this construction type can be found in Bishkek (Kyrgyzstan) and the other Republics of the former Soviet Union. Many buildings with cast in-situ load-bearing reinforced concrete walls can be found in Moldova. This type of housing construction is commonly found in urban areas.

Summary: Buildings with cast in-situ load-bearing reinforced concrete walls are widespread in many Republics of the former Soviet Union. There are many such buildings in Kyrgyzstan in areas with design seismicity of 8 and 9 on the MSK scale. The buildings with cast in-situ walls are typically medium- to high-rise buildings (4-18 stories high; often 12-stories high). High-rise buildings of this type (9-18 stories high) have basements. The load-bearing structure consists of cast in-situ reinforced concrete walls and precast reinforced floor slabs. Floor slabs are either flat slab structures, or, less often, hollow-core slabs. Buildings of this type do not have any frame elements (columns or beams). Facade walls are usually made of lightweight (ceramsite) concrete. Buildings of this type are supported by concrete strip or mat foundations.

This building type is considered to be earthquake-resistant. Problems are mainly related to the quality of construction.

Length of time practiced: 25-60 years

Still Practiced: Yes

In practice as of:

Building Occupancy: Residential, 50+ units

Typical number of stories: 4-18

Terrain-Flat: Typically

Terrain-Sloped: 3

Comments:

Buildings with cast in-situ load-bearing reinforced concrete walls


2. Features

Plan Shape: Square, solidRectangular, solid

Additional comments on plan shape: Typical shape of a building plan for this housing type is rectangular or square; in some cases, the plan consists of two rectangles or squares.

Typical plan length (meters): 26-30

Typical plan width (meters): 12-14

Typical story height (meters): 3

Type of Structural System: Structural Concrete: Precast Concrete: Shear wall structure with walls cast in-situ

Additional comments on structural system: Lateral load-resisting system: The lateral load-resisting system consists of reinforced concrete walls and reinforced concrete slabs. Walls and slabs are joined together in a rigid space (3-D) system. This system works as a uniform (box-type) construction. Floor slabs are either flat slab structures, or, less often, hollow-core slabs. Buildings of this type do not have any frame elements (columns or beams). Thickness of exterior (facade) walls is usually 300-400 mm, and the thickness of interior walls is 160-200 mm. Thickness of flat slabs and hollow-core slabs is 160 mm and 220 mm, respectively. Facade walls are usually made of lightweight (ceramsite) concrete; thickness is variable depending on the thermal insulation requirements. Buildings of this type are supported by concrete strip or mat foundations. Wall reinforcement is based on the Building Code requirements. Vertical reinforcement bars are located close to the door and window openings, as well as at the wall end zones and at the wall intersections. Distributed vertical reinforcement is typically installed throughout the wall length, typically in two layers. In addition, two layers of welded-wire mesh are typically installed close to the exterior wall surfaces. If the walls are perforated with openings, coupling beams (spandrel beams) are designed for bending and shear effects. The reinforcement bars are joined by welding or lap splices.

Gravity load-bearing system: Gravity load-bearing structure consists of reinforced concrete walls and slabs.

Gravity load-bearing & lateral load-resisting systems:

Typical wall densities in direction 1: 10-15%

Typical wall densities in direction 2: 10-15%

Additional comments on typical wall densities: The total wall density in both directions is on the order of 15%. Wall density in one direction amounts to approx. 70-80% of the wall density in the other direction i.e. walls are rather uniformly distributed in the two principal directions.

Wall Openings: Typical window opening size is 1.3m (height)x1.8m (width), door openings: 2m (height)x1m (width). Overall window and door areas constitute up to 20% of the wall area. There are 20 to 25 windows in a building with plan dimensions of 28x26m.

Is it typical for buildings of this type to have common walls with adjacent buildings?: No

Modifications of buildings: Typical patterns of modification include the perforation of walls with door openings. This has been a very serious problem in Kyrgyzstan since 1992. There has been a trend of people purchasing apartments at a low cost and using them as shops. As a result of these modifications, the number of door openings on the exterior load-bearing walls has increased; fragments of the walls have been removed and apertures on the lower stories have been made. Modifications of this type have resulted in increased seismic vulnerability for buildings of this type. In an attempt to regulate this process in Kyrgyzstan, an annex to the Building Code has been developed, under the title #Change of the building function of some space of the existing apartment buildings# (SNiP 31-01-95). It is interesting to note that in Uzbekistan, modifications in the apartment buildings of this type are prohibited at the ground floor level.

Type of Foundation: Shallow Foundation: Reinforced concrete strip footingShallow Foundation: Mat foundation

Additional comments on foundation:

Type of Floor System: Other floor system

Additional comments on floor system: Floor and roof slabs are of precast construction (either hollow core slabs or solid slabs).

Type of Roof System: Roof system, other

Additional comments on roof system: Floor and roof slabs are of precast construction (either hollow core slabs or solid slabs).

Additional comments section 2: When separated from adjacent buildings, the typical distance from a neighboring building is 20 meters.

Buildings with cast in-situ load-bearing reinforced concrete walls

Buildings with cast in-situ load-bearing reinforced concrete walls


3. Buildings Process

Description of Building Materials

Structural Element Building Material (s) Comment (s)
Wall/Frame Wall: Reinforced concrete Wall: Characteristic Strength-30-35 MPa ( cube compressive strength) 390 MPa (steel yield strength) Mix Proportion/Dimensions- variable, depending on the type of ingredients in the mix
Foundations Reinforced concrete Characteristic Strength: 10-15 MPa ( cube compressive strength) 295 MPa (Steel yield strength) Mix Proportion/Dimensions: variable, depending on the type of ingredients in the mix
Floors Reinforced concrete Characteristic Strength: 30-35 MPa ( cube compressive strength) 390 MPa (steel yield strength) Mix Proportion/Dimensions: variable, depending on the type of ingredients in the mix
Roof Reinforced concrete Characteristic Strength: 30-35 MPa ( cube compressive strength) 390 MPa (steel yield strength) Mix Proportion/Dimensions: variable, depending on the type of ingredients in the mix
Other

Design Process

Who is involved with the design process?: EngineerArchitectOther

Roles of those involved in the design process: Designs were prepared by specialized design institutes with expertise in this construction practice. Design for this construction type was done completely by engineers and architects. Engineers played a leading role at each stage of construction.

Expertise of those involved in the design process: Expertise related to the design and construction of this building type according to the building regulations of Kyrgyzstan was available.


Construction Process

Who typically builds this construction type?: BuilderOther

Roles of those involved in the building process: Construction is performed by builders. Design (construction) documents are developed in the design institutes.

Expertise of those involved in building process: Expertise related to the design and construction of this building type according to the building regulations of Kyrgyzstan was available.

Construction process and phasing: Specialized construction companies fabricate precast concrete elements and perform casting of concrete in-situ. Precast elements are made at the factory. Main construction equipment includes crane, welding equipment and concrete mixers.

This building is not typically constructed incrementally and is designed for its final constructed size.

Construction issues


Building Codes and Standards

Is this construction type address by codes/standards?: Yes

Applicable codes or standards: SNiP II-7-81. Building in Seismic Regions. Design code. The first and most recent code/standard addressing this type of construction was issued 1981.

Process for building code enforcement: Building permit is issued if design documents have been approved by State Experts. The State Experts check for compliance of design documents with pertinent Building Codes. According to the building bylaw, a building cannot be used without the formal approval.


Building Permits and Development Control Rules

Are building permits required?: Yes

Is this typically informal construction?: No

Is this construction typically authorized as per development control rules?: Yes

Additional comments on building permits and development control rules:


Building Maintenance and Condition

Typical problems associated with this type of construction:

Who typically maintains buildings of this type?: BuilderOwner(s)Renter(s)

Additional comments on maintenance and building condition:


Construction Economics

Unit construction cost: For load-bearing structure only: about 150 US$/sq m.

Labor requirements: It would take 10 to 18 months for a team of 15 workers to construct a load-bearing structure for a building of this type.

Additional comments section 3:

Buildings with cast in-situ load-bearing reinforced concrete walls


4. Socio-Economic Issues


5. Earthquakes

Past Earthquakes in the country which affected buildings of this type

Year Earthquake Epicenter Richter Magnitude Maximum Intensity

Past Earthquakes

Damage patterns observed in past earthquakes for this construction type: Buildings of this type have not been subjected to the effects of damaging earthquakes in Kyrgyzstan as of yet. However, many existing buildings of this type in Kichinev, Moldova, were exposed to an earthquake of intensity 8 on the MSK scale. Many of these 12-story buildings suffered damage in piers at the lower stories due to the poor quality of concrete construction.

Additional comments on earthquake damage patterns: The most common type of damage includes concrete crushing and spalling at the locations of construction joints, as well as the inclined diagonal cracks in the wall piers (due to the shear failure). Severe damage and collapse is not expected.


Structural and Architectural Features for Seismic Resistance

The main reference publication used in developing the statements used in this table is FEMA 310 Handbook for the Seismic Evaluation of Buildings-A Pre-standard, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., 1998.

The total width of door and window openings in a wall is: For brick masonry construction in cement mortar : less than ½ of the distance between the adjacent cross walls; For adobe masonry, stone masonry and brick masonry in mud mortar: less than 1/3 of the distance between the adjacent cross walls; For precast concrete wall structures: less than 3/4 of the length of a perimeter wall.

Structural/Architectural Feature Statement Seismic Resistance
Lateral load path The structure contains a complete load path for seismic force effects from any horizontal direction that serves to transfer inertial forces from the building to the foundation. TRUE
Building Configuration-Vertical The building is regular with regards to the elevation. (Specify in 5.4.1) TRUE
Building Configuration-Horizontal The building is regular with regards to the plan. (Specify in 5.4.2) TRUE
Roof Construction The roof diaphragm is considered to be rigid and it is expected that the roof structure will maintain its integrity, i.e. shape and form, during an earthquake of intensity expected in this area. TRUE
Floor Construction The floor diaphragm(s) are considered to be rigid and it is expected that the floor structure(s) will maintain its integrity during an earthquake of intensity expected in this area. TRUE
Foundation Performance There is no evidence of excessive foundation movement (e.g. settlement) that would affect the integrity or performance of the structure in an earthquake.TRUE
Wall and Frame Structures-Redundancy The number of lines of walls or frames in each principal direction is greater than or equal to 2.TRUE
Wall Proportions Height-to-thickness ratio of the shear walls at each floor level is: Less than 25 (concrete walls); Less than 30 (reinforced masonry walls); Less than 13 (unreinforced masonry walls);TRUE
Foundation-Wall Connection Vertical load-bearing elements (columns, walls) are attached to the foundations; concrete columns and walls are doweled into the foundation.TRUE
Wall-Roof Connections Exterior walls are anchored for out-of-plane seismic effects at each diaphragm level with metal anchors or straps.TRUE
Wall Openings TRUE
Quality of Building Materials Quality of building materials is considered to be adequate per the requirements of national codes and standards (an estimate).FALSE
Quality of Workmanship Quality of workmanship (based on visual inspection of a few typical buildings) is considered to be good (per local construction standards).FALSE
Maintenance Buildings of this type are generally well maintained and there are no visible signs of deterioration of building elements (concrete, steel, timber).FALSE

Vertical irregularities typically found in this construction type: Other

Horizontal irregularities typically found in this construction type: Other

Seismic deficiency in walls: Poor quality of concrete, especially at the location of construction joints; the “as constructed” reinforcement locations do not match with the design locations; inadequate length of lap splices in steel rebars; inadequate confinement in highly stressed areas.

Earthquake-resilient features in walls: The load-bearing structure (consisting of walls and slabs) represents a rigid box system favorable for resisting lateral load effects.


Seismic Vulnerability Rating

For information about how seismic vulnerability ratings were selected see the Seismic Vulnerability Guidelines

High vulnerabilty Medium vulnerability Low vulnerability
A B C D E F
Seismic vulnerability class /- o -/

Additional comments section 5: The most serious problem with the buildings of this type is poor quality of concrete.


6. Retrofit Information

Description of Seismic Strengthening Provisions

Structural Deficiency Seismic Strengthening
Poor quality of concrete (especially at the lower part of the building); poor quality of construction joints Reinforced concrete jacketing, shotcreting

Has seismic strengthening described in the above table been performed?: N/A

Was the work done as a mitigation effort on an undamaged building or as a repair following earthquake damages?: N/A

Was the construction inspected in the same manner as new construction?: N/A

Who performed the construction: a contractor or owner/user? Was an architect or engineer involved?: N/A

What has been the performance of retrofitted buildings of this type in subsequent earthquakes?: N/A

7. References

Seismic Hazard and Buildings Vulnerability in Post-Soviet Central Asia Republics. Edited by Stephanie A. King, Vitaly I. Khalturin and Brian E. Tucker. Kluwer Academic Publishers, P.O. Box 17, 3300 AA Dordrecht, The Netherlands. (Proceeding of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Earthquake Risk Management Strategies for Post-Soviet Central Asian Republics. Almaty, Kazakhstan, 22-25 October 1996)


Building and Construction Design in Seismic Regions.Handbook. Uranova S.K., Imanbekov S.T., et al. KyrgyzNIIPStroitelstva, Building Ministry Kyrgyz Republic.Bishkek.1996.


Authors

Name Title Affiliation Location Email
Svetlana Uranova Dr., Head of the Laboratory KRSU Kievskai 44, Bishkek 720000 Kyrgyz Republic uransv@yahoo.com
Ulugbek T. Begaliev Head of Department KNIIPC Vost Prom Zone Cholponatisky 2, Bishkek 720571 Kyrgyz Republic utbegaliev@yahoo.com
Manukovskiy V. Chairman “Bishkekproject” Chui prospect 164A 720001 Kyrgyz Republic

Reviewers

Name Title Affiliation Location Email
Svetlana N. Brzev Instructor Civil and Structural Engineering Technology, British Columbia Institute of Technology Burnaby BC V5G 3H2, Canada sbrzev@bcit.ca
buildings_with_cast_in-situ_load-bearing_reinforced_concrete_walls.txt · Last modified: 2020/01/14 19:36 (external edit)