Report Date:
Country: PERU
Housing Type:
Housing Sub-Type:
Author(s): Cesar Loaiza, Marcial Blondet
Last Updated:
Regions Where Found: Buildings of this construction type can be found in all parts of Peru, particularly in the coastal region. This type of housing construction is commonly found in urban areas.
Summary: This multifamily housing construction type has been the most commonly used in the urban areas of Peru during the last 35 years. Confined masonry buildings consist of load-bearing unreinforced clay masonry walls confined by cast-in-place reinforced concrete tie columns and beams. Tie columns are cast after the construction of the masonry walls is complete and theyare connected to the tie beams. Confined masonry walls have limited shear strength and ductility; however, buildings of this type typically have a good seismic resistance.
Length of time practiced: 25-60 years
Still Practiced: Yes
In practice as of:
Building Occupancy: Mixed residential/commercial
Typical number of stories: 4-6
Terrain-Flat: Typically
Terrain-Sloped: 3
Comments:
Average 6 units in each building; usually there are from 4 to 8 units in each building.
Plan Shape: Rectangular, solid
Additional comments on plan shape:
Typical plan length (meters): 20
Typical plan width (meters): 12
Typical story height (meters): 2.7
Type of Structural System: Masonry: Confined Masonry: Concrete blocks, tie columns and beams
Additional comments on structural system: Lateral-load resisting system: The lateral load-resisting system is confined masonry wall system. Confined masonry walls give stiffness to the structure and control lateral drift. Tie columns and post beams prevent damage due to out-of-plane bending effects and improve wall ductility. Tie columns have the longitudinal reinforcement necessary to resist overturning moments. In some cases, reinforced concrete walls are required to avoid cracking of reinforced concrete elements. Gravity load-bearing system: Generally, the same system as described above. Floor and roof structures are composite structures, made of masonry units and concrete joists that transfer the gravity loads to the walls.
Gravity load-bearing & lateral load-resisting systems:
Typical wall densities in direction 1: 4-5%
Typical wall densities in direction 2: 4-5%
Additional comments on typical wall densities: The typical structural wall density is up to 5 %. Total wall area/plan area (for each floor) is 3-5%.
Wall Openings: A typical building has 3 to 4 windows (typically 1 to 2 m wide) in each in the longitudinal direction. In the transverse direction there may be one or two openings per facade.
Is it typical for buildings of this type to have common walls with adjacent buildings?: No
Modifications of buildings: In some cases owners build additional interior walls as a part of the building extension (new rooms or bathrooms).
Type of Foundation: Shallow Foundation: Reinforced concrete strip footing
Additional comments on foundation: Usually the foundation is of plain (unreinforced) concrete unless the soil is clay or silt
Type of Floor System: Other floor system
Additional comments on floor system: Composite masonry and concrete joist; in the analysis, the floors are considered to be rigid diaphragms.
Type of Roof System: Roof system, other
Additional comments on roof system: Composite masonry and concrete joist.
Additional comments section 2: When separated from adjacent buildings, the typical distance from a neighboring building is 0.5-1.0 meters.
Average plan area is 260 m.sq. Length varies from 15 to 30 m, and the width varies from 5 to 15 m. Story height varies from 2.5 meters to 2.8 meters.
Structural Element | Building Material (s) | Comment (s) |
---|---|---|
Wall/Frame | Clay masonry | Characteristic Strength: Compression strength: 12 -16 MPa Shear strength: 0.5 - 0.8 MPa Compression strength depends on the quality of bricks. Mix proportions/dimensions: 1:4 / 90 mm X 12 mm X 24 mm |
Foundations | Concrete | Characteristic Strength: Compression strength: 14 - 18 MPa |
Floors | Concrete Steel | Characteristic Strength: Compression strength: 21- 35 MPa Steel yield stress: 410 MPa |
Roof | Concrete Steel | Characteristic Strength: Compression strength: 21- 35 MPa Steel yield stress: 410 MPa |
Other | Concrete Steel | Characteristic Strength: Compression strength: 21-35 MPa Steel yield stress: 410 MPa |
Who is involved with the design process?: EngineerArchitect
Roles of those involved in the design process: Engineers are in charge of the structural design and construction process. Architects are in charge of the architectural design and in some cases in charge of the construction process.
Expertise of those involved in the design process: Both the structural and the construction engineer should have 5 years of study and minimum work experience of 2 years.
Who typically builds this construction type?: Other
Roles of those involved in the building process: Construction companies build the buildings of this type and sell them.
Expertise of those involved in building process: Both the structural and the construction engineer should have 5 years of study and minimum work experience of 2 years. Commonly, the construction process is inspected. The designer may visit the construction process once or twice during the construction.
Construction process and phasing: Masonry walls are built with serrated endings, then tie columns are cast against them. After that tie beams, lintels and floors are built simultaneously. The equipment commonly used is: concrete mixer, traveling crane, winch, trucks.
Typically not built incrementally, buildings originally designed for final constructed size.
Construction issues
Is this construction type address by codes/standards?: Yes
Applicable codes or standards: Seismic Design Standards E-030 (1977) National Construction Standards, Masonry Standards E-070 (1998) The most recent code/standard addressing this construction type issued was 1998.
Process for building code enforcement: Municipal authorities approve the structural and architectural design for the building. It is common that the owner hires a private inspector to supervise the construction process.
Are building permits required?: Yes
Is this typically informal construction?: No
Is this construction typically authorized as per development control rules?: Yes
Additional comments on building permits and development control rules:
Typical problems associated with this type of construction:
Who typically maintains buildings of this type?: BuilderOwner(s)Renter(s)
Additional comments on maintenance and building condition:
Unit construction cost: Unit construction cost may vary from 200 to 300 US$/sq m.
Labor requirements: Depending on the technology used, the construction of a typical building may take 2-3 stories per month.
Additional comments section 3:
Year | Earthquake Epicenter | Richter Magnitude | Maximum Intensity |
---|---|---|---|
1970 | Chimbote | 7.8 | VI (MMI) |
1974 | Lima | 7.7 | VIII (MMI) |
1996 | Nazca | 7.3 | VII (MMI) |
Damage patterns observed in past earthquakes for this construction type: Wall shear cracking that propagates through tie columns.
The main reference publication used in developing the statements used in this table is FEMA 310 Handbook for the Seismic Evaluation of Buildings-A Pre-standard, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., 1998.
The total width of door and window openings in a wall is: For brick masonry construction in cement mortar : less than ½ of the distance between the adjacent cross walls; For adobe masonry, stone masonry and brick masonry in mud mortar: less than 1/3 of the distance between the adjacent cross walls; For precast concrete wall structures: less than 3/4 of the length of a perimeter wall.
Structural/Architectural Feature | Statement | Seismic Resistance |
---|---|---|
Lateral load path | The structure contains a complete load path for seismic force effects from any horizontal direction that serves to transfer inertial forces from the building to the foundation. | TRUE |
Building Configuration-Vertical | The building is regular with regards to the elevation. (Specify in 5.4.1) | TRUE |
Building Configuration-Horizontal | The building is regular with regards to the plan. (Specify in 5.4.2) | TRUE |
Roof Construction | The roof diaphragm is considered to be rigid and it is expected that the roof structure will maintain its integrity, i.e. shape and form, during an earthquake of intensity expected in this area. | N/A |
Floor Construction | The floor diaphragm(s) are considered to be rigid and it is expected that the floor structure(s) will maintain its integrity during an earthquake of intensity expected in this area. | TRUE |
Foundation Performance | There is no evidence of excessive foundation movement (e.g. settlement) that would affect the integrity or performance of the structure in an earthquake. | TRUE |
Wall and Frame Structures-Redundancy | The number of lines of walls or frames in each principal direction is greater than or equal to 2. | TRUE |
Wall Proportions | Height-to-thickness ratio of the shear walls at each floor level is: Less than 25 (concrete walls); Less than 30 (reinforced masonry walls); Less than 13 (unreinforced masonry walls); | TRUE |
Foundation-Wall Connection | Vertical load-bearing elements (columns, walls) are attached to the foundations; concrete columns and walls are doweled into the foundation. | TRUE |
Wall-Roof Connections | Exterior walls are anchored for out-of-plane seismic effects at each diaphragm level with metal anchors or straps. | N/A |
Wall Openings | TRUE | |
Quality of Building Materials | Quality of building materials is considered to be adequate per the requirements of national codes and standards (an estimate). | TRUE |
Quality of Workmanship | Quality of workmanship (based on visual inspection of a few typical buildings) is considered to be good (per local construction standards). | TRUE |
Maintenance | Buildings of this type are generally well maintained and there are no visible signs of deterioration of building elements (concrete, steel, timber). | FALSE |
Vertical irregularities typically found in this construction type: Other
Horizontal irregularities typically found in this construction type: Other
Seismic deficiency in walls: Limited ductility and the absence of tie columns diminishes shear strength.
Earthquake-resilient features in walls: Good transfer of seismic forces
For information about how seismic vulnerability ratings were selected see the Seismic Vulnerability Guidelines
High vulnerabilty | Medium vulnerability | Low vulnerability | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | D | E | F | |
Seismic vulnerability class | /- | o | -/ |
Structural Deficiency | Seismic Strengthening |
---|---|
Columns | Installation of additional shear reinforcement in tie columns (Figure 7) |
Parapets and nonstructural walls (new construction) | Parapets are confined with tie-columns and bond-beams. When parapets are located between tie-columns, walls are isolated through construction joints. |
Has seismic strengthening described in the above table been performed?: Yes, parapets are confined and non structural walls are isolated from the structure.
Was the work done as a mitigation effort on an undamaged building or as a repair following earthquake damages?: The seismic strengthening was done in a new construction.
Was the construction inspected in the same manner as new construction?: N/A
Who performed the construction: a contractor or owner/user? Was an architect or engineer involved?: Usually engineers are involved.
What has been the performance of retrofitted buildings of this type in subsequent earthquakes?: Good seismic performance: parapets resist overturning forces and cracking effects were reduced in non structural walls..
Harmsen y Mayorca, 1997, de Estructuras de Concreto Armado, Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru.
Norma Peruana de Albanileria E-070, 1998, Capitulo Peruano del ACI.
Norma Peruana de Sismorresistente E-070, 1998, Capitulo Peruano del ACI.
Quiun, San Bartolome, Torrealva, Zegarra, 1997, El Terremoto de Nasca del 12 de Noviembre de 1996, Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru.
San Bartolome, 1994, Construcciones en Albanileria, Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru.
San Bartolome, Munoz, Rodriguez, 2001, Fuerzas as de para Edificaciones de Albanileria, Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru.
Name | Title | Affiliation | Location | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cesar Loaiza | Professor | Civil Engineering Dept., Catholic Univ. of Peru | POB 1761 100 Lima, Peru | cloaiza@pucp.edu.pe |
Marcial Blondet | Professor | Civil Engineering Dept., Catholic Univ. of Peru | POB 1761 100 Lima, Peru | mblondet@pucp.edu.pe |
Name | Title | Affiliation | Location | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sergio Alcocer | Director of Research | Circuito Escolar Cuidad Universitaria, Institute of Engineering, UNAM | Mexico DF 4510, MEXICO | salcocerm@iingen.unam.mx |