Report #: 156

Report Date:

Country: TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO

Housing Type:

Housing Sub-Type:

Author(s): Richard P. Clarke, Rakesh Ramnath

Last Updated:

Regions Where Found: This type of housing construction is commonly found in rural, sub-urban and urban areas.This form of construction is to be found in about 70% of all of the residential construction (i.e. isolated houses, apartment buildings, condominiums, townhouses).

Summary: Typical single-story residential construction in Trinidad and Tobago comprises 100 mm thickunreinforced clay tile or concrete block masonry (URM) load-bearing walls supporting the roof. The roofing is a 20 to 30 degree gable or hipped shape and is of approximately 0.2 to 0.5 kN/m2 in weight. It comprises galvanized steel sheets supported by timber laths or coldformed steel Z-purlins, in turn supported by timber or structural steel rafters. The rafters are nailed or bolted to the top of the walls, without blocking between the rafters. The flexible roof cannot act as a diaphragm. The soil class ranges from IBC classes B to E. Given the significant seismic hazard for Trinidad and Tobago, (i.e. rock PGA in the range of 0.2g to 0.6g for 10% exceedance probability in 50 years), this form of residential construction is quite vulnerable.

Length of time practiced: 25-60 years

Still Practiced: Yes

In practice as of:

Building Occupancy: Single dwelling

Typical number of stories: 1

Terrain-Flat: Typically

Terrain-Sloped: Typically

Comments:

This type of construction has become prevalent because it is the least costly.The main function of this building typology is sin

Plan Shape: Rectangular, solid

Additional comments on plan shape: A typical residential structure is rectangular and 8.6 m wide x 11.0 m long, in plan. The floor height is typically 2.4 m.The walls on the perimeter of the roof support the roof, though sometimes an interior wall can be used as well. Thesame type of URM wall is used for the internal partitions and are connected to other walls by 'toothing'.

Typical plan length (meters): 7-14

Typical plan width (meters): 6-10

Typical story height (meters): 2.4

Type of Structural System: Masonry: Unreinforced Masonry Walls: Brick masonry in lime/cement mortar

Additional comments on structural system: Gravity Load-Resisting SystemThe vertical load-resisting system is un-reinforced masonry walls. The load-bearing walls are under combined axialload and out-of-plane bending. Since they are supported at the base on a simple mortar bed, and given the simpleconnection to the roof rafters at the top, the walls are 'pinned' at their base and at the top of the walls.Lateral Load-Resisting SystemThe lateral load-resisting system is un-reinforced masonry walls. Under lateral load the walls cannot be considered asflanged in -plan since the vertical connections between walls at their corners are inadequate for structural integrity.Given the low roof weight and wall weight, and their squat aspect ratio, the walls will act as shear walls resisting inplanesliding loads at the base joint and out-of-plane toppling loads. There is a RC beam at the top of the walls thatact as a “ring beam” enabling a degree of interaction among orthogonal walls.

Gravity load-bearing & lateral load-resisting systems: It is not “brick” that is used, but rather either clay tiles, which have horizontal cells, or concrete hollow blocks, whichhave vertical cells.

Typical wall densities in direction 1: 3-4%

Typical wall densities in direction 2: 3-4%

Additional comments on typical wall densities: The typical structural walldensity is up to 3 %. There is limited scope for variation since the amount of structural wall area is determined by theroof support requirements.Wall proportions are up to 25% for unreinforced masonry wall.

Wall Openings:

Is it typical for buildings of this type to have common walls with adjacent buildings?: No

Modifications of buildings: The most common type of modification is to add along one or both sides of the house for additional bedrooms,expansion of the kitchen or living room, or for a carport.

Type of Foundation: Shallow Foundation: Reinforced concrete strip footing

Additional comments on foundation: It consists of cast in-place reinforced concrete piers. Wall footings are used when the soil is firm. They are typically0.6m wide and 0.3m deep with 3 No. 12mm high tensile steel longitudinal rebars, and 10mm mild steel transverserebar at 250mm center-to-center spacing. Cast-in-place piers are used when the soil is soft. The tie-beams are typically0.3m wide and 0.4m deep with 3 No. 12mm high tensile steel longitudinal rebars top and bottom, and 10mm mildsteel transverse rebar at 200mm center-to-center spacing. The piles are typically spaced 3.0m apart along wall lines andare 300mm in diameter and 4.0m deep with 4 No. 16mm high tensile steel longitudinal rebar, and 10mm mild steeltransverse rebar at 200mm center-to-center spacing. For both types of foundation, the concrete typically has a 28-daycompressive strength of 21 MPa (3000 psi). The regions between the tie beams are comprised of slab-on-gradeconcrete construction as described previously for the case of shallow foundations.

Type of Floor System: Other floor system

Additional comments on floor system: The floor is a 100mm thick slab-on-grade and the reinforcement is steel fabric of 142 mm2/m.

Type of Roof System: Roof system, other

Additional comments on roof system: The roofing iscomprised of galvanized steel sheets supported by timber laths or cold-formed steel Z-purlins, in turn supported bytimber or structural steel beams or rafters.

Additional comments section 2: On sloping land it is common practice to cut or fill and use retaining walls When separated from adjacentbuildings, the typical distance from a neighboring building is 5.0 meters.

Who is involved with the design process?: Other

Roles of those involved in the design process: Certified architects or engineers have no role with respect to typical residentialsingle-story construction in Trinidad and Tobago.

Expertise of those involved in the design process:

Who typically builds this construction type?: Other

Roles of those involved in the building process: The design is 'deemed-to-satisfy' based on custom, and the construction is by uncertified apprentices of certifiedbuilders, but under their supervision. Certified architects or engineers have no role with respect to typical residentialsingle-story construction in Trinidad and Tobago.The builder typically lives in this type of construction.

Expertise of those involved in building process:

Construction process and phasing: The typical construction process is: 1. Prepare the site. 2. Install the foundation. 3. Install the floor slab. 4. Build theexternal walls on the floor slab. 5. Install the roof. 6. Build the internal partition walls. 7. Install the electrical andplumbing items. 8. Plaster all walls. 9. Paint the walls. The construction of this type of housing takes place in a singlephase. Typically, the building is originally designed for its final constructed size.

Construction issues

Is this construction type address by codes/standards?: No

Applicable codes or standards:

Process for building code enforcement:

Are building permits required?: Yes

Is this typically informal construction?: Yes

Is this construction typically authorized as per development control rules?: Yes

Additional comments on building permits and development control rules:

Typical problems associated with this type of construction:

Who typically maintains buildings of this type?: Owner(s)Renter(s)

Additional comments on maintenance and building condition:

Unit construction cost: Typical construction cost is TT$4,800/m2 including contractor markup and excluding the cost of the land (1US$=TT$6.36). The current labor to material cost is about 75%.

Labor requirements:

Additional comments section 3:

Damage patterns observed in past earthquakes for this construction type: The durations for the earthquakes were short (<6 sec). Damage was mainly as repairable horizontal or diagonalcracking to piers. In south Tobago in the 1997 event there was considerable liquefaction failure. There were about 3events of magnitude > 5.5 from 1997 to the present of (MMI) V to VI. Data is available from the Seismic ResearchCenter of The University of the West Indies.

The main reference publication used in developing the statements used in this table is FEMA 310 Handbook for the Seismic Evaluation of Buildings-A Pre-standard, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., 1998.

The total width of door and window openings in a wall is: For brick masonry construction in cement mortar : less than ½ of the distance between the adjacent cross walls; For adobe masonry, stone masonry and brick masonry in mud mortar: less than 1/3 of the distance between the adjacent cross walls; For precast concrete wall structures: less than 3/4 of the length of a perimeter wall.

Additional comments on structural and architectural features for seismic resistance: The quality of the materials and workmanship relative to standards' requirements are not measurable since no standards existfor this type of housing construction.

Vertical irregularities typically found in this construction type: No irregularities

Horizontal irregularities typically found in this construction type: No irregularities

Seismic deficiency in walls: Load-bearing Walls - Unreinforced, slender, low bearing stress.

Seismic deficiency in roof and floors: Roof - No chord continuity.

Earthquake-resilient features in foundation: Foundation - Capacity to demand probably high.

For information about how seismic vulnerability ratings were selected see the Seismic Vulnerability Guidelines

Additional comments on seismic strengthening provisions: None exists as a code, but the University of the West Indies developed recommendations based on wall testing andthe use of ferrocement overlays. This is available over the internet

Has seismic strengthening described in the above table been performed?: The strengthening procedure described has not been utilized.

The Hysteretic Behaviour of Ferrocement-Retrofitted Clay Tile WallsRichard P. Clarke and Anil K. SharmaAmerican Concrete Institute Structures Journal 2004 Vol 101 No. 3 pp 387-394